Wednesday, 25 February 2015

Very Good Girls

Dir. Naomi Foner, USA, 2013, 91 mins
Cast: Dakota Fanning, Elizabeth Olsen, Boyd Holbrook, Ellen Barkin, Richard Dreyfuss, Demi Moore, Clark Gregg
Review by Leilani Holmes published on Close-Up Film

Very Good Girls is a good title, capturing the essence of this film about two privileged teens growing up close in an idyllic corner of Brooklyn: virgins, best friends, living in and out of each other’s homes and experiences as they prepare for life after high school, growing from the security of shared everythings into the privacy necessary to become truly emancipated young women.

Lilly (Fanning) is leaving soon for Yale, attempting to boost her college fund with a job as boat trip tour announcer. Mild sexual harassment from her ardent boss and the infidelity of her father make her last summer far from perfect other than the time she spends with her best friend. Gerri (Olsen) comes from a bohemian paradise where no subject is off topic at the family dinner table, but as she groans at freedoms taken for granted, she is insecure about what the future might hold or how she will define herself when Lilly leaves her behind. Both girls are forming their ideas of what sex and relationships might mean to them, through the adults around them and as they leave behind their 'good girl' identities to embrace a more daring adventure of adulthood and all it brings.

One of the things it brings is David (Holbrook), a surly ice-cream vendor the girls encounter after a particularly boisterous day skinny-dipping on a crowded beach. Emboldened by their outing Gerri attempts to flirt and win over the handsome young enigma, while Lilly, though equally enamoured, returns his rude flippancy in equal measure, telling him exactly what she thinks of him. David, as it turns out, has more than ice-cream to his sweetness. A burgeoning photographer and artist he is intrigued by Lilly enough to snap her retreating form and poster the image in the area she frequents in order to draw her back into his radar. Lilly falls under his spell before she discovers that Gerri has tracked down David in order to win him for herself; in an effort to preserve her friendship while protecting her new experience she keeps her relationship with David a secret.

What's intriguing about the film are the things that are so firmly unsaid. Little is made of the girls’ background or privilege, the innocence of their issues in comparison to David's necessity for self-reliant independence or the devastations happening in the lives of the parents, or the sadness of the sleazy boss who becomes the poster boy for what you can turn into if you refuse to grow up.

Subtly scripted and beautifully acted by an accomplished cast, the undercurrents tow us more surely than the narrative through this story. It's well put together with a wistful innocence to the cinematography and a rich atmosphere to the sound design that anchors us in the locations these girls have grown up in. Though the soundtrack is somewhat youthful and cloying it fits its target teen audience. The film is simple but charming, sometimes annoying but thoughtfully directed by Foner (mother of Maggie and Jake Gyllenhaal) making a late but adept transition from screenwriting to direction with this debut.

Though the film is aimed at a younger audience, the lessons for life contained within it are there for everyone to see and we learn that being very good girls is not so much a state of being for everyone else to appreciate as it is a way of being true to yourself. Something to remember in adulthood as much as it is to explore in youth.

Very Good Girls is released on DVD on 19 January. Buy from Amazon

1915: The Battle For The Alps

Dir: Ernst Gossner, Austria, 98 mins, dubbed into English
Cast: William Moseley, Eugenia Constantini
Review by Leilani Holmes originaly published on Close-Up Film

At an idyllic family owned alpine hotel where Andreas' Austrian sister is marrying her Italian engineer love, prejudice between the two nations permeates what should be a happy and uniting event. Andreas for one shares his teacher’s contempt and suspicion for Italians until he is captivated by sight of Francesca, a beautiful young guest from the Italian side of the gathering, and makes an effort to know her.

However this is May 23rd and when Italy declares war on Austria-Hungary mid celebrations the two halves of this newly minted family must hastily separate to their own sides of the mountainous border to ensure survival. Bride and groom part after a hasty consummation but in the confusion, and despite Andreas' need to report for defence duty up in the mountains, he hides Francesca in a basement storeroom where the pair do some consummating of their own before he leaves her with instructions to signal him with a firework if she gets into trouble and needs him to return. The story has all the makings of an epic war romance set on a front where the great enemy is nature as much as it is foreign neighbours. The screenplay attempts to deal with the many dramatic threads of war; but in the enormity of possibilities writer Clemens Aufderklamm, (who usually writes for TV) fails to bring sufficient focus to a 98 minute film. With similarly jumbled direction by Ernst Gossner, the plot ends up being confused and diluted by a surfeit of peripheral happenings.

That said, the film has it's interesting villains and heroes and explores a high altitude front of WWI that has been little explored in other WWI movies. There's no singular element that isn't interesting, but without sufficient time to expand all of them the film would have benefitted greatly for cutting some in favour of telling a more concise, fully realised story.

The cast, led by a compelling William Mosely (of Chronicles of Narnia fame) do ample work humanising some pretty naive characters but a lot of the colloquial charm is lost through some mediocre dubbing into English. This is inevitable with all dubbing but is here not aided by the addition of multiple accents which prove quite confusing in the beginning of the film, when ethnic origin is important. Still the characters all have engaging qualities, not least the two villains, comprised of a narcissistic blackmailing teacher sent home from the front for being mostly annoying and a lunatic Italian commander who decides he's going to bring down an entire mountain with a tunnel and a shed load of explosives right on top of the hotel where the wife of the engineer he's employed to this task lives with their newborn. Meanwhile leads Andreas and a re-discovered Francesca are played with just enough empathy to hold a somewhat confused plot together and to keep us rooting for them.

The cinematography succeeds well in setting these mere mortals against the implacable Dolomite mountains. The landscapes and action are coupled with great sets and costume and helped along with some decent VFX to embellish the godlike elements the soldiers are pitted against. The soundscape too works well, most notably when its absence, like a stopped pulse, creates high drama. The score, however is mostly overbearing and might have been better left out. Overall, the production standards are good and this despite considerable problems filming in unforgiving terrain where the production ran into severe weather difficulties. Crew needed rescue at one point and a location destroyed by flooding meant that a key battlefield scene had to be dropped altogether. It's certainly testament to a pretty determined set of individuals that this film was finalised and put forward among Austria's Oscar considerations this year. This is testament perhaps to the importance of this aspect of European history and the imposing Austrian/Italian alpine landscape, for which it is worth taking a look at this film. That and the small, well realised moments that illustrate how prejudices are nurtured or dissipated by the people we draw near to us.

1915: The Battle for the Alps goes on home entertainment release from 19 January. Buy from Amazon.

Friday, 12 December 2014

Kajaki: The True Story

I recently wrote this feature article for Show Film First about the production of  British  war film Kajaki. Read it in it's original situ here.

Dir: Paul Katis
Cast: David Elliot | Mark Stanley | Scott Kyle | Benjamin O’Mahony | Bryan Parry
UK Cinema Release: 28 November 2014
Certificate: 15
Running Time: 108 minutes

by Leilani Holmes

Historically, British war films form a strong part of our cultural history yet for modern conflicts, the stories of British troops have been largely missing from our cinema screens. Until that is, director Paul Katis, writer Tom Williams and producer Andrew de Lotbinière of Pukka Films met a young soldier celebrating his 18th birthday during an MoD training film they'd been commissioned to make. Discovering he was to be in Afghanistan three weeks later they realised they knew nothing of what this young soldier's experience was going to be and decided their first feature film should be about the everyman soldiers today, “It was a way of joining the dots between real people and what was happening in Afghanistan,” remembers de Lotbinière. “You listen to the news and read the stats, but you don’t always see the people behind those stories.”

“A lot of the work we do is based on case studies,” explains Williams. “We have a bit of experience in researching real events and crafting dramas around them.” Researching to find a suitable true story to adapt to the big screen they came across a unique situation featuring 3rd Batallion troops immobilised by a minefield in a difficult to reach wadi next to the Kajaki Dam in Helmand Province, Afghanistan. The story was a single contained event that was not combat oriented but perfectly reflected the extraordinary courage shown by men on the ground looking out for one another under exigent circumstance. “As a single-location drama, it felt it would be great for us to do as a first feature,” says de Lotbinière. “It was a small film that we were much more likely to get budgeted and made.”

The film they eventually realised became an accurate portrayal of the situation that occurred when a rescue mission and helicopter evacuation for a wounded soldier escalated. Lance Corporal Stuart Hale, crossing what looked to be a harmless dry river bed had stepped on a land mine left behind from the Russian Afghan occupation of the 1980s. Losing a leg and left stranded and bleeding on lethal ground, the operation to treat his wounds and get him to a safe landing area for the helivac became complicated as essential personnel crossed the precarious surface to bring aid. Further explosions triggered during their efforts left seven men grievously injured and resulted in the subsequent death of Corporal Mark Wright a 27 year old from Edinburgh, posthumously awarded the George Cross for bravery to mark his actions that day.

Drawing from personal accounts of those involved, official Army Board of Enquiry reports and with the assistance of the MoD, Tom Williams sought to layer multiple accounts into a screenplay telling the true story with an ensemble cast without needing to fictionalise or dramatize or add big names to the production. “It’s the film that Facebook made in a way,” Williams says, “because we put together a research group, and one friend invited another, invited another. The military are quite big on Facebook, because it’s a great way for them to stay in touch while they’re away, and so we started to gather the team on there.” With authoritative voices behind the project the film resonates with banter and military language that allows for authentic expression from the soldiers point of view while remaining easy for an audience to grasp in context.

Oscar winning producer Gareth Ellis-Unwin who had worked with Pukka films years before was approached. Convinced by the quality of the screenplay and the idea to choose now to tell an Afganistan story, he came aboard to help steer the production into cinemas. “I was blown away not just by the quality of Tom’s writing but by the idea that we hadn’t really made a British war movie for 50-odd years, and I do believe there’s a grateful nation ready to receive the veterans of the Afghan theatre as they come back home this year.”

From the Facebook research the filmmakers decided to take their project on to another more public online platform, crowdfunding site, in order to gauge public interest in their story and attract investors. Once again enthusiastic online support built up for the project. “We set ourselves a target of £40,000, which we ended up exceeding,” notes Ellis-Unwin. In fact, the grand total raised this way was £47,197. It was great to see how the public responded." The filmmakers too, responding to stories from the real soldiers who's tale they were telling, decided their film could give something back and joined with several forces charities in order to utilise the film to benefit their efforts and revenues from the film premiere and several preview screenings plus a portion of the film profits are being divided between Help for Heroes, The Royal British Legion, Walking with the Wounded and The Hashemite Commission for Disabled Soldiers.

The search for authenticity led director Paul Katis to take an ensemble cast to a perfect location in the Al Kafrein Dam in Jordan, where again the project received huge support,courtesy of the Jordanian Armed Forces and His Majesty the King who gifted an engineering team and considerable arms and equipment to create infrastructure for the production and maximise the scope of the film. Again keen to give back, the filmmakers consulted with the Jordanian government to encourage future film production in the region, something the Jordanian government is keen to facilitate. Says Ellis-Unwin: “We could have shot this in a chalk pit in Kent, but you wouldn’t have got the same movie. When you see sweat, it’s sweat. When you see flies in peoples’ mouths and wounds, they’re really there. The heat is unrelenting and there’s not one person on this unit that hasn’t gone above and beyond what they’d normally be expected to do to ensure that the story is told well, accurately, and honestly.”

The film premiered to a crowd of veterans and public who's enthusiasm and appreciation for this authentic and visceral film spread out from the red carpet back across the social networks through which it began. It's production has created value within our culture above and beyond mere storytelling and maybe it's time to see more British war related stories hitting our big screens and once again becoming a staple of British Film.

Kajaki goes on national release from November 28th with tickets and advance screenings available through


Dir. Matthew Hammett Knott, 2014, 83 Minutes, CERT 15, English
Cast. Tessa Peake-Jones, Josie Lawrence, James Norton, Eleanor Wyld

My review of Bonobo written for Close-Up Film

Naked frolicking is how we begin 'Bonobo' but far from skin deep is the desire within all of us to find our own happy place in society.

This is the exploration as middle aged Judith (Tessa Peake-Jones), pressured by the expectations of her middle class society, goes to retrieve her daughter Lily (Eleanor Wyld) from a bohemian commune formed around the social structure of  Bonobo apes who resolve societal conflict through sex.

Arriving to find her wild imaginations of naked ramblings made real 'in the flesh' and with her daughter's refusal to have her life path 'corrected' Judith is persuaded by cult leader Anita (Josie Lawrence) to stick around and better understand their community and why Lily chooses to be there.

Not all the Bonobo residents are that welcoming of Judith's explorations though and as rampant resident Ralph (James Norton) stirs things up, it is not only Judith who ends up questioning whether the values of, even benevolent, sexy monkeys truly can make them happy.

The screenplay, penned by Joanna Benecke and director Matthew Hammett Knott  is well structured with a premise ripe for fun, however it is one perhaps better suited to be set in the nineteen-fifties than the present day. Though the film has great characters, strong middle aged women leads and a fine ensemble cast, the scenes often hold an inner awkwardness with actors efforts to avoid actual exposure creating the wrong kind of tension around the nudist freedoms (and naked threesomes).

Some of the comedy, too, seems to jar against simple cinematography and sound and is more often amusing than hilarious with an ‘ooh missus’ factor feeling forced over what could otherwise have been naturally funny situational scenes.

However, there are still cheeky bits that shine through and it’s worth remembering that this is a debut feature made on a micro-budget; while the superficial skin has a few flaws, the important flesh of the film hits emotional gold with real intimacy being found during thoughtful, clothed moments when characters discover their own and each others’ needs and we get to consider our own along with them.

The impression the film leaves is one of love, love of humanity, love of ourselves. If Matthew Hammett Knott can continue to touch our inner bits with such engaging tenderness in his future work he could become a cult of British cinema for real.


As a continuation from his talk at this year's London Screenwriters' Festival, development executive Steve La Rue has kindly forwarded some updated and encouraging news for the LSF Blog of how the predictions he and Dave Reynolds made back then are being realised now and why we should be writing our own personal stories.

Steve La Rue ~ Photo by Marcos Avlonitis

A Follow-up with Steve La Rue

As the delegates from the 2014 LSWF continue to work on their screenplays, I wanted to touch base and to follow-up on this panel discussion as Hollywood continues to roll out the Superhero Movie news and Television Pilot developments.

The major headlines from this panel discussion were: Tell Your Personal Stories and Don’t Chase the Superhero Trend.

So, in the news everyday here in Hollywood, there’s a new Superhero Movie either getting greenlighted or cast and a TV series adaptation getting a pilot commitment on the hour. That’s the trend to be aware of but not to chase. Look at the repercussion of the trend, instead.

The major headlines from this panel discussion were: Tell Your Personal Stories and Don’t Chase the Superhero Trend.

So, in the news everyday here in Hollywood, there’s a new Superhero Movie either getting greenlighted or cast and a TV series adaptation getting a pilot commitment on the hour. That’s the trend to be aware of but not to chase. Look at the repercussion of the trend, instead.

One film I want to point out to the delegates at LSWF is #BOYHOOD which just won Best Film from the LA Film Critics as well as Best Director for Richard Linklater. This week, both the Screen Actors Guild and the Golden Globes have awarded multiple nominations, as well.

This film is a very simple story that is lovingly told and very creatively produced…a perfect example of counterprogramming against 800 pound gorilla films like THE HOBBIT, etc.

(Note to Delegates: I can’t wait to see THE HOBBIT!)

Thanks to BOYHOOD, Hollywood is going to get in the small, personal story Game now that they see it succeeding. Commercially, this film is a watershed project, and this is great news for those writers working on very intimate creations.

There is a market for Personal Stories.

For those who don’t know, BOYHOOD shot over a period of 10 years, one week/per year at a cost of $200k per year. It will easily turn a profit, especially, if it receives some Oscar love, as predicted by many critics. So, an Original Story that is Creatively Produced can also be Commercial.

So, continue to be brave and explore your own life and tell your most challenging, personal stories. They don’t have to be overly complex, either. Just honest and authentic.

In TV News, networks continue to be influenced by Trends in Film.

The super-hero genre continues to make its presence felt as SyFy Channel just announced it’s developing a Superman Prequel series, KRYPTON, in hopes of duplicating Fox’s success this season with the Batman-inspired prequel, GOTHAM. Over at CBS, they are developing SUPERGIRL; at TNT, they are working on TITANS; Netflix has JESSICA JONES; and at AMC, they are adapting the comic PREACHER.

Personal Stories that are making Commercial Headway in TV…include TRANSPARENT, a series that’s on everyone’s TOP TEN LIST of BEST SERIES OF 2014.

ORANGE IS THE NEW BLACK continues to influence and challenge the networks to be bolder programmers.

Television is getting more creative, as well, demonstrated by the Repertory-Style casting of series such as FARGO, TRUE DETECTIVE, and AMERICAN HORROR STORY. Fox has ordered a pilot called SCREAM QUEENS, which will feature a different cast each season, as well.

Pilot Season is well under way here as the networks hand out either script or pilot commitments to worthy projects.

With relatively new players such as NETFLIX and AMAZON, however, pilot season is now year-round and not just confined to the traditional broadcast networks’ schedule.

Steve La Rue

Monday, 27 October 2014

Jackie Malton and Pete Salt, The Real Sources Behind Prime Suspect and Casualty ~ #LondonSWF

Realism, that thing that gives drama it's impact, often involves writers going to a source or special consultant to enrich the content of their work. Two such sources Jackie Malton on who's life Lynda La Plant based Jane Tennison in Prime Suspect and Pete Salt the inspiration for Casualty's Charlie Fairhead joined Casualty co-creator Paul Unwin to talk about the process of being an expert source.

The relationship between fiction and fact is very distinctive. At the end of the day, says Paul, audiences want to switch off the TV and still be able to feel that the world is okay. Given that, how does story work with facts to create realistic drama?

For Jackie she was brought a script by Lynda La Plante who'd been referred by a mutual police acquaintance as she was looking for a high ranking woman detective to authenticate the character and crime she was writing about. There are police advisors who can check facts for writers but Jackie had never really wanted to do that, however she did have an interest in the stories behind the crimes and people she came into contact with. Their process became that she would be brought a script to read through, then meet with Lynda to talk about what was incorrect in the procedure or behaviours described in the writing. Jackie says that talking to Lynda was like going to therapy. Lynda never wrote notes, just allowed her to speak asking questions when appropriate. Then she'd go away and when she came back a while on all sorts of things Jackie had revealed would have emerged inside the new draft.

For factual correctness there's a fine balance to be achieved as to what's healthy for the public to see about professions that deal with life and death. Jackie wouldn't want for instance to reveal too much about actual police tactics for dealing with serious incidents that might endanger them solving future crimes. That's where artistic licence can take hold. For Pete, the whole premise of Casualty is to be as accurate as possible but there are things that might be medically unsafe to put out there that he'd prefer to hold back on. Even if something really happened it's not always wise for it to be included in a drama and care is taken to scrutinise story that might cause distress to viewers who've experienced loss or hurt.
The way Pete works in his role to advise the Casualty writing staff is to get hold of the basic story outline for an episode and what's going to happen medically in it as soon as possible so he can see if the medicine the premise is based on will work for the story. If someone's had a serious head injury they're not going to be better by the end of the episode and massive multiple injuries most frequently leave patients unable to speak for some time. Either there's a solve or alternative in the medical facts that can work around a problem, if not then the story may need to be changed. Usually he'll look over about five drafts of a script during the writing process. Sometimes a show has it's own 'grammar' that shades what the storylines should be, like Casualty's medical accuracy. Jackie worked for 13 years advising on The Bill that had a grammar of 'crime doesn't pay'. Both Jackie and Pete point out that their job is to advise about the more complex aspects of their work and not as proxy writers or encyclopedias for people too lazy to do their own work and research. The best writers take the notes they are given on board, not so good writers hold onto their stories no matter what.

Over time long running series can sometimes become gratuitous but the reality of situations of life and death can be very visceral for the people involved says Jackie. Society fails people and some of those people are the people who become criminals. Writers aren't touched by the emotions that stay with police, doctors and other crucial professons. Maggots on a corpse will likely trigger real life memories and emotions that remain with a person who's seen a fellow human being in that state. It can be harsh spilling information, it exposes you. The story of character Jane Tennison's life and alcoholism is Jackie's story, she had internalised much. Though she hasn't had a drink for 22 years the crimes she worked, the people involved are still very real to her.

Writers, hungry for stories, conflict, drama and grit often want to know what the worst thing is that a source they speak to has experienced on the job. Pete has learned that quite often when he's gone there, he's just upset them. The worst of life and death professions can be very bad indeed and people don't really want to watch distressing horror on their screens. He recommends writers ask instead about the incidents that most impacted people. Often it might not be the horrific thing you'd expect to hear but something small that is still dramatic because it holds rich human story in it. Jackie says you have to have empathic curiosity, stand in the source's shoes, ask questions that are deep and you'll find the emotional drama.

Sources it's clear bring a huge amount of experience to scripts. Over time consultants become adept at advising on points of writing accuracy and that's something that should be valued and approached with humility. Recognise always that sources are being courageous in what they tell you and in some situations, especially if you're writing about things like injustices or national policy their own jobs could be affected by speaking out. Most people like to see their professions well represented and will want to help if they can and it's easy to go into a police station or hospital and politely ask if someone can answer a couple of questions you have about procedure even if you don't have personal contacts to tap into. Many people are in these jobs in the first place because they are predisposed to help others.

I for one, recognised the huge helpfulness of Jackie and Pete in coming to speak to us today, one of the most invaluable sessions I've experienced this weekend and a great final seminar to wrap up on, because in sharing stories (as William Nicholson said wonderfully earlier this weekend) we transmit values within our society and it's well worth remembering and including feedback from the real life people who are very much a part of that society we represent on screen.

Getting a Writing Gig that Lasts Years: Writing Sit-Coms ~ #LondonSWF

Sit-Coms are, love 'em or hate 'em, a lasting style of comedy and one in which, if you're fortunate enough to be good at, can provide work that lasts for many years. Comedy writer and director Paul Basset Davies (Spitting Image, Alas Smith & Jones) hosted a discussion with Pete Sinclair (Lead Baloon, Never Mind the Buzzcocks), Karol Griffiths (How I Met Your Mother, Friends) and John Lloyd (Blackadder, Not the Nine O'clock News) about comedy writing and the waning art of the sit-com.

As a writer who wants to write sit-com Paul suggests we have to immerse ourselves in the craft, but what is a sit-com? What are those unique qualities that make this particular sub-genre work? In sit-coms, people first and foremost are usually trapped in a situation they can't escape. Maybe they are trapped in an awful marriage or business like Fawlty Towers, or confined to prison for a long time like Porridge. Writing for that comedic clash is about finding the comedy in those things in life that don't readily change and that provide ongoing conflict.

There are some rules to sit-com writing, but its worthwhile noting that many shows will break a rule at some point. For example, mostly you'd be looking to a handful of regular characters that your show is always about but Dads Army had a very large cast of characters and worked well because of it, and Blackadder introduced a new major character each week which was kind of it's thing. Writing comedy certainly tends to be a community effort, many lines made funnier by actors thoughts and improvisations, and in terms of the process it helps to have a writing partner, team or someone that you can bounce stuff off. Cost however means UK writers rooms are unlikely to become a reality nowadays with management looking for predictability in what will grow audience and commissioners finding it a struggle to get fresh shows agreed.

Styles of comedy will differ. It's our job as the next generation of comedy writers to give people half an hour a day where they can leave aside their problems and feel better. The writers submit that sit-com in essence needs, even in it's darkest form, to be dark and jolly rather than dark and edgy. Shows like 'The Thick of It' and 'Yes Minister' were examples of comedies that made bleakness their thing. Even they can be a little heavy to watch if you just want some light relief at the end of a hard day. Pete Sinclair comments on how comedy at the moment trends towards being very overt with shows like 'Mrs Brown' being very popular for their brashness, but he'd like to see new writers bringing forth shows that are more subtle and intelligent to balance that. Karol Griffith thinks a lot of sit-coms are really mean these days, she's even left a few shows that felt mean preferring to work instead on things that move her and have a lot of heart.

There's been some change in recent years with the way television is managed and there are far less comedy producers than we had in the days of prominent popular shows like 'Dads Army' or 'Porridge'. Comedy writing is hard there's no doubt. Good one-liners are hard to write for anyone, to write a bunch of them to turn into sketches is really difficult and not every writer will be capable of doing that. Comedy, John Lloyd points out is a rare gift. There are more brain surgeons in the world than good comedy writers. In the US Karol tells us there are more comedy pilots than ever being made these days, although with just one episode to grab an audience before they've had time to get to know the characters it's still tough to get a pilot to series.

With the changing ways content is delivered now there's a real possibility that comedy channels will emerge for new comedy with producers and commissioners that understand comedy specifically and can support emerging work as it should be supported. Writing as much as possible, taking the money jobs to hone skills and meet contacts and future collaborators, then grow those skills enough to be able to write entire shows. Or make content yourself, it's so much easier these days with crowd-funding or online platforms. Watch out on comedy websites like the QI website to see when they're looking for new writers. If you can write something really funny then it will get picked up. Skills will out is the message of the day. Opportunity exists, and that's no joke!

Originality, Commercialism and Creativity: Steve La Rue and David Reynolds ~ #LondonSWF

There are twenty-nine superhero movies currently scheduled for release, TV development exec Steve La Rue calmly announces to a gasp from the many delegates in the room. Even for those of us with some understanding of industry trends, hearing that figure stated aloud is astonishing. Though the superhero genre is in decline it still makes lots of money and pulls a majority of financing into it's vortex and away from the more 'risky' original stories that could be being made instead. The repercussion of the studio successes with this genre is that TV emulates those studio decisions and we're seeing a lot more superhero TV also. There's certainly a market for these shows but Steve doesn't think the trend will last and what replaces it will depend on what new writing can offer.

Steve has flown in Santa Monica, California to join Disney and Pixar writer David Reynolds to talk to us about re-invigorating the industry and finding that place in our writing that is fresh and that also has a market. Firstly he points out that good writing still matters in the superhero genre, TV series Flash is currently getting more traction than the show Arrow that it sprung from, because of the writing. There's a glut of content that serves the fanboy set and those of us in that group love what we're getting, but with one demographic receiving the bulk of the market right now it's worthwhile looking for those gaps that can be filled. Personal stories like Orange is the New Black have found their support base from people who have been starved for content more relatable to themselves. It's success as a show has united the creative community who are looking for the next Orange to attract and retain those audiences.

Our little lives are interesting it seems, there's a lot more drama in our lives these days for starters, we all have extended and step family situations, drama in the workplace, we travel more. We have busy dramatic lives. Amazon's new show Transparent, about an ordinary family where the dad comes out as transsexual is resonating with audiences right now. From Six Feet Under and United States of Tara writer Jill Soloway the story happened in her own life. "It just immediately hit me as this is the show I've been waiting my whole life to write." she told Rolling Stone recently proving that personal stories can be fulfilling for writers as much as audiences.

Only you have that insight into your own stories Steve tells us, by all means throw in that supernatural hook or whatever you like to write but you don't need an amazing hook to begin with. Once you have that simple premise you can just throw 'what if' at it until you have seven or eight stories to form episodes. You don't need 24 for a series anymore, dramas are going shorter these days. It's easier than you think to find a premise you care about and begin writing original story that only you can tell.

Selling your stories is about your personal insight too. You have to own your idea, to be able to point out what's unusual and what's universal, that's your hook and what makes you, not some other writer more qualified to write your tale. If you pitch a cool sexy idea, you still have to know how to write within that world, so maybe you make the astronauts like your family. You have stuff that's relatable and then you just lay the whole world on top of that. Buffy the Vampire Slayer was really the concept that for teens in high school, life is hell. 

You're going to write a lot of stuff that people don't like, Steve and David tell us. We all do. You're going to write a lot that people like too, and if you can learn to write to your own personal voice you can write anything.

Silence of the Lambs: Script to Screen with Screenwriter Ted Tally ~ #LondonSWF

There's not a lot of talking going on, even from Ted Tally, as Silence of the Lambs plays on screen gripping a room of hundreds. Personally I'd forgotten how good it is. The film is iconic, enthralling and every moment is pregnant with emotion. The fact that it still plays well and we sink into it so easily so many years later, Ted says, is down to the costume and set design that has meant the film hasn't dated much and remains relevant. Though Ted himself hadn't watched this film for a decade seeing it with us today he admits "It holds up very well."

Though exceedingly violent the film, Ted illustrates to us, was not mindlessly violent. For instance when Lecter is moved to a cell and escapes, killing the guards, that's a shocking and horrific thing. The first guard violently attacked, his tongue bitten out reveals the true cannibalistic nature of Hannibal, the second, bludgeoned to death we see only Hannibal and blood splash, not the blows hitting or the guard dying. It was the most tasteful way Ted tells us, that you can film such a violent act against a human being. Strung up like a crucified moth, echoing the butterfly motif that permeates the visuals throughout the film the second guard becomes a type of performance art for Lecter to distract from the second guard's body on the floor, he doesn't want them looking too closely at that barely breathing survivor who is not quite what he seems. These vistas are not there to be gratuitous or merely shock, they underpin crucial elements of the story and theme.

Ted credits much of the plot genius to the original novelist, Thomas Harris saying there are mythic underpinnings to his writing. I could never have come up with that plot twist, he admits as the ambulance scene plays out., or the one with the two houses at the end. In adapting the novel for screen though he did make some bold decisions that broke the usual rules of screenwriting, in the escape scene we've just seen for instance, we have broken away from our protagonist for some fourteen minutes. It was crucial to include that scene from the book, he tells us, and he told himself it was okay to leave Clarice behind for a bit because when we go back to her, we never have to leave her again for the rest of the movie. Don't break the rules just the break them, he tells us later, you have to trust your story to lead you and if you need to break the rules to make it work, you do. The one rule never to break though is the rule that says "don't bore the audience" he adds wisely.

Ted always assumes a very smart engaged audience for his work saying the audience is much smarter than we give them credit for, most have seen thousands of stories already and they're way ahead of you. He makes a point to say that the screenplay was easier to write than it looks, the book was a banquet of material, far more really than was needed for a movie but with no flab in it. Writing the adaptation he was very conscious of the subtext, Clarice mourning for her father's long ago death, Ted's own father dying as he wrote the scenes. The ending was changed to give hope though. Rather than an original plan to have Lecter find Chiltern hiding out with personal security somewhere but director Jonathan Demme wanted to allow for the illusion that Chiltern might get away. Ted came up with the idea that maybe he would be getting on a plane to the tropics and then you could cut to a scene where Lecter, on the phone to Clarice, was already there waiting for Chiltern to arrive. You mean you and I would take Anthony and a small crew to the tropics in January to write and film this scene, and it would be paid for by the production budget? was Jonathan's approving response. The rest of this story of course, is film history.

The British Screenwriters' Awards 2014: Hosted by Rhona Cameron

In a star studded (Ted Tally and Joel Schumacher sat next to one another in the front row counts) and joyous event 2014 found itself the year that was putting screenwriters at the forefront as the British Screenwriters' Awards burst into being.

Four awards were up for grabs in this inaugural event and if that sounds like humble beginnings for an awards event then we should be humbled only by the outstanding writing from TV and Film work of the nominees. And set within the warm arms of the London Screenwriters' Festival it was a heartfelt affair to honour the true architects of great storytelling, the writers themselves.

Hosted by the redoubtable Rhona Cameron who had us in raucous stitches and kept us that way for some time, the awards, golden envelopes an' all, were greeted by roars from a packed house full of screenwriters honouring their own. Here at the London Screenwriters' Festival we are a family, inspiring each other to excel. "Writers are conductors of the soul." Rhona imparts philosophically.

Here are the nominees and winners of this first event. Many thanks to The Writers' Guild of Great Britain for their sponsorship of the event.

Outstanding Newcomer for British Television Writing

‘Murdered By My Boyfriend’ by Regina Moriarty (BBC3)
‘Raised By Wolves’ by Caitlin Moran and Caroline Moran (Channel 4)
WINNER: ‘In the Flesh’ by Dominic Mitchell, John Jackson and Fintan Ryan (BBC3)
‘My Mad Fat Diary’ by Tom Bidwell, Rae Earl and Laura Neal (Channel 4)

Outstanding Newcomer for British Feature Film Writing

WINNER: ‘Saving Mr Banks’ by Kelly Marcel and Sue Smith
‘The Riot Club’ by Laura Wade
‘Starred Up’ by Jonathan Asser
‘Pride’ by Stephen Beresford

Best British TV Drama Writing

‘The Honourable Woman’ by Hugo Blick (BBC2)
WINNER: ‘Happy Valley’ by Sally Wainwright (BBC1)
‘Sherlock’ by Stephen Moffatt and Mark Gatiss (BBC1)
‘Utopia’ by Dennis Kelly (Channel 4)

Best British Feature Film Writing

‘The Selfish Giant’ by Clio Barnard
WINNER ‘Philomena’ by Jeff Pope and Steve Coogan
‘Locke’ by Steven Knight
‘The Double’ by Richard Ayaode and Avi Korine - Film News